Ironically, the fourth grade team has been discussing summative versus formative assessments. The research indicates that the best learning occurs in a class where the students feel they can take risks and are more concerned about their learning than their marks. But, for some the number of top marks on a report card is their intrinsic desire to push hard.
So here are some examples of reading response letters from our current class (I have removed the names to avoid any unforeseen trouble)
Needs Improvement (2)

The student neither explains what interested them about the book, nor why they would recommend it to others. He needs to specify details from the novel which support what he is sharing in his weekly letter. I wish to see examples of how the students are making connections to the book (ie memories it brings up, parts of the book which were easy to picture in their minds, parts that were surprising and why)
The above (level 2) letter does not explain why the student enjoyed the book. In fourth grade, I’m expecting to see a series of 1-3 pieces of clear evidence to support a view of the book. However, I do like how the student mentioned they would lie to get their dream job position. Unfortunately, the lesson of the where the character ends up does not seem to be made clear to the student.
The student does not share any of their thinking that incurred while they were reading. In my response to her, I asked if she found it unusual that a dog was a detective. At the very least, I enjoy reading about why they are selecting the books, if they learned anything while reading them, what the author’s message was or anything they disagreed with – anything to show they were thinking while reading.

I need to see details or evidence from the story to back up why it’s amazing or interesting. Actually, it’s even better to mention a particular part of the story that was outstanding and to include details so the readers of the letter can understand why the student is excited.

The student has shared some parts of the novel, but certainly not enough to make me want to read the book. In fourth grade, I want to see thinking by the student while reading the text. For me, I would have been asking myself why is the dog his only friend. The title alone provides a few questions to me that will take a few chapters to answer I’m sure. In the end, lack of details leave this a level 2 entry.
On par (3)

The above letter showed how the student could clearly indicate why they are reading their current novel, but needs to share more thoughts while they are reading (ie do they think someone could learn how to read at age 2)
Lots of details – but I would have loved to see if the student could explain why Mark changed his mind about school.
Top Marks (4)

Student comments on the author’s message, his learning while reading and share their personal reflection following reading the piece – how they wish to travel

The above selection was the same student who did the first poor (level 2) entry – notice his improvement. First, his entry is much longer, and he includes background summary of story in contrast. He identified the anxiety of his main character and shared details to support his reading theories.

The above (level 4 letter) shows how the student used her own rabbit when painting an image in her mind of the rabbit from the story. She was alert to the difference between the cover depicting two rabbits and the story having one predominantly. While she was reading, she shared how she wondered when that second rabbit would show up.

It’s always a pleasure to see one of my new ESOL students show she is getting the newly introduced reading strategies. Here, she correctly identifies the problem of the story and the consequences that result from Junie B Jones copying other students. In fact, she goes further to explain how she would behave differently if she were in that situation. This shows she was actively picturing the events and reflecting as she was reading! Excellent.

One of my favorite entries this year came from a student who had visited Japan and was likely the reason she selected this text. I liked how she provided many details how the Japan of her experience differed from the one she read about. It shows she was thinking and constantly comparing while she was reading. This is higher order thinking and it’s the sort of stuff I want to see in the student’s weekly letters.
That is all I will share for now. Perhaps in another few months, we’ll have the students select the top five entries from the class. We will be actively supporting letters that include many details, show evidence of various forms of thinking (predictions, reading theories, analyzing the writer’s technique, character analysis and connections to real life experiences) — I hope over the next few weeks, the student’s weekly letters continue to improve.